Finally, in any case, Mac users will likely be able to fall back to using a virtual machine (like Virtual Box, Fusion, or Parallels). We will also be working with CodeWeavers to explore options for them to continue compatibility support for the BibleWorks Mac Installer.
#BIBLEWORKS 7 ON MAC FULL#
BibleWorks is in good shape for this, and we will soon release a full 圆4 Mac Installer dmg. The coming macOS versions require 64-bit programs.
#BIBLEWORKS 7 ON MAC MAC OS#
We will do our best to insure compatibility of BibleWorks 10 with future Mac OS changes but the situation is more complex than with the PC platform. What about the Mac version of the program?īibleWorks updates for the PC will also work on the Mac platform. Compatibility updates will be provided through the normal updater mechanism within the program. This will ensure that you can continue to use the program for the long term. We will, Lord willing, continue to provide compatibility fixes for BibleWorks 10 well into the future. If you have a valid license for BibleWorks 10 you can continue to use the program as usual. Also the virtual XP instance memory was increased from 512K to 768K which greatly improved performance for apps such as Bibleworks.Can I continue to use BibleWorks on a PC? Also from other Mac users I have learned that the Mac needs at least 2gig of Ram on the Mac to make virtualization work as expected. I can have Word or Open Office running on the Mac and cut and paste from Bibleworks on the virtual windows machine without any issues.
A nice feature of Parallels is the Coherence (along with the parallel tools ) features that allows the Mac and virtual machine to share the same desktop. Bibleworks starts up slow, but after the load and the virtual machine adjusts memory allocations it appears to run the same as it did on my HP laptop before I changed to the MacBook Pro. I have been using Bibleworks v7 in a virtual XP Pro sp2 768K instance that operates on my Mac using Parallels (both versions 3 or 4) for over 2 years. This is the most stable environment I have experienced using a Mac with virtual OS's and Bibleworks for Windows. Like I said.something like 80% functionality.Īny one else have post-Snow Leopard problems? the lexical reader was fine and copy / paste seemed to work great. I had to get a chm reader for the help files, and the toolbar didn't work.
When last I had BW8 running on CrossOver.I had about 80% functionality. support page indicates that in the future a 64-bit version of your apps will required. 2346e397ee (macOS says, 'BibleWorks is not optimized for your Mac. Any version of BW from version 7 to the current version 10. So.at least with Snow Leopard I seem to have worked myself into a corner. Jen Johnson on UPDATED BibleWorks 10 64 Bit. My original choice for Bible software was BibleWorks (BW), and I have kept up with this. I've read that you should use Vista rather than XP for the CrossOver bottle, but I can't find a copy of Explorer that will run in a Vista bottle. I've reinstalled in a new bottle (XP) and still no joy. BW8 now crashes every time I try to run it.
#BIBLEWORKS 7 ON MAC INSTALL#
I've had a very stable CrossOver install for the past few months, but when I upgraded to Snow Leopard something changed.
But just a bit too slow to work with for hours a day. I agree that BW on Virtual Box (and I assume VMWare from what you've said) is a memory / processor hog. I used Virtual Box on both platforms with a Wine install as a backup. I've been running BW 8 on a MBP for a few months now.
0 kommentar(er)
